SnowflakeMoray (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

My mom has a subaru she loves it but its time for a new one. She like most women who have one couldnt care less about it going from 0 mph to whatever in seconds if its not as good with gas as her old one she wont buy it.

CooLDsteR (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

not 209... 2-9-0 ft lb. torque.

waktasz (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

It's not slower, it's the new SAE ratings. It has 13 more horsepower than last year.

tman152 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

the legendary battle between the Evo and the STI for me has been in rally racing and the last couple of years it has been a battle for 3rd or 4th place. Subaru is going with the smaller more agile hatchback cars that have been dominating wrc recently. while The EVO is staying in Sedan form. we will see if they can get back in competitive form with these cars

george8399 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

i think the earlier sti looks way better but i guess all it needs is some getting used too

Trashjack101 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Well thats all good and nice but realistically, how fast do you really need a car?

yangboi08 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

209 ft torque? 4.9 sec in 60? This is slower than earlier STI models and looks aren't as nice.

ericeng91 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

sorry i must say, don't even bother bringing in looks. the evo now looks like a POS and the STI isn't too much better. But i do agree the STI has the trophey right now.

Nismoleb89 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

i think the legendery battle between EVO and STI is going for the STI this time! i mean, the sti has the power, and looks, the evo has gained some wieght!

metring073 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

What aa extended fender blisters makes a big difference...