|
MohummedsM8 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
So what you are saying is that the warped part of Christianity is just that... Warped, but the fundamentalist side of Islam is just following the good book written by Mohummed... Err I mean Allah. So that makes it OK for Muslims to go kill in the name of Islam, because they are following what is says in their good book...I totally agree with you...Allah akba
theonlyabyssal (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"And so it was, that all that fell that day, both of men and women, were twelve thousand, even all the men of Ai. For Joshua drew not his hand back, wherewith he stretched out the spear, until he had utterly destroyed all the inhabitants of Ai. Only the cattle and the spoil of that city Israel took for a prey unto themselves, according unto the word of the LORD which he commanded Joshua." Joshua 8:25-27
DanieljDixon (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
In all fairness Christianity has had those who misrepresent it. Catholicism had its inquisitions, crusades, and centuries of child molestation. And of coarse it has had to endure the whaling avarice at the pulpit who simply use it for their need to have their doghouse air conditioned. The difference is that many have taken the doctrine of Christ twisted it, ignore it then use it for their own personal gain, but the Islamic radical sits securely in the belly of Muhammad's Koran.
DanieljDixon (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I personally don't believe that Islam was responsible for 911, but I think that if Muslims could have pulled it off without those inside they certainly would have. Islam is a waring religion, Muhammad was a waring "prophet". Sure it is probably a very small percent that are radical, however the Muslim majority applauds them, honors them and certainly makes no effort to control them.
kayfabepro (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
First of all, Bobby Kennedy was not killed by Surhan, though not through lack of trying. The fatal shot that killed Bobby Kenneddy came from behind. Secondly, hatred of the U.S, throughout the Arab world, can be said to have began in either 1948 or 1953. In 1948, the U.S. was instrumental, along with Britain, in the destruction of Palestine. And, in 1953 the United States and Britain overthrew democracy in Iran.Interesting that neither of these instances in history get a mention.
flamezstr33t (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The crusades an answer to Islamic agression? lol!
munich64 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Goodman's analogy about Oklahoma City went right over the corporate pundits' heads. They didn't even know how to respond.
munich64 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The corporate media has been SO reluctant to expose the pattern of U.S. interventions and U.S. support for state terrorism. It is media censorship that has kept so many Americans ignorant enough to actually believe moronic cliches like "they hate us for our freedom"
munich64 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The corporate media has been SO reluctant to expose the pattern of U.S. interventions and U.S. support for state terrorism. It is media censorship that has kept so many Americans ignorant enough to actually believe moronic cliches like "they hate us for our freedom"
simplybornhuman (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Islamics should be the very last to speak about racism or slaveryv=KNwhbo451YMv=KC0ms5BO3i0v=Nx36TvchW4Iv=eSok_SsDJbAv=k9cfGlGtROM |
